07/31/26 - Kids you’ve raised for 5 years weren’t actually yours, but they are your husband’s, they just have a different mom.
“The media actually very rarely reports on cases of real scumbag men in divorces, or at least they don’t report in so much detail, mostly in case people try to copy it. For example, the extramarital affair IVF case that’s been dominating the trending hashtags for the last week [where a wife with cancer discovered her husband had forged a marriage certificate to do IVF with his mistress and demanded that the foetus be destroyed, and it was denied by the hospital] has been in common practice for a long time. There’s a whole entire professional step-by-step about this. These scumbags can legally make it so that their wife can’t get any money.
This method is most often seen in divorce cases for national companies and university researchers.
I’ll tell you guys a specific example. The wife reported a man named A doing research work in a university. According to her, her husband made some kind of material that can make a lot of money in his research, and then cheated with a mistress and had a child with her, and put together a scheme to divorce his wife and keep everything for himself.
It’s a pretty astounding case so everyone was interested and went and studied exactly how he pulled it off.
A was a researcher who handed over all his paychecks and he didn’t have much money. But he has a partner, B. Deducing from what they did, B married A’s mistress first, and then went overseas to make a test tube baby, C. That is to say, C’s biological father is A, but his legal father is B. Then B started a companies which held the rights to the technology and put it under C’s name as an underaged child.
Then A got divorced from his wife. He only has a very low wage as provable income, and his wife already held all of it. He didn’t ask for any of it. Then B got a divorce with the mistress, and A married the mistress. Then through adoption, he became C’s adopted dad, and he received stock that B held of the company he started.
Look at this procedure, and you’ll find why the child C exists. The logic is simple. A doesn’t want to share his money with his wife, and he can’t completely trust his mistress or his partner B either. So he created a kid who’s B’s child on paper, but actually his by biology, and put the money-making patent in C’s name. That way, his wife can’t get any money, and he can relax.
Then he marries his mistress by divorcing and marrying again, and making it so that he’s his biological child’s adopted father. No problem with that, right?
Once you understand this case, then go look at the topic #IVF mistress taunts wife by posting pictures, and actually figure out the conflict involved here. Then you’ll figure out that no matter how you amend laws, you can’t really do anything about this. We’ve already had precedent. It’s just that back in the day, the media had a lot to consider and they were worried about copycats, and they had to promote the idea that the law was infallible to make people think less.
Now it’s the information age. A lot of limitations you thought were meaningful have actually been pointless for a while now.”
Comments say, “1. Is it not enough that he handed over all his wages? Does his wife want everything or what? 2. Do patents you make as a part of your work fall under marital law so close the wealth gap or something?”
“Weird, why would B and the mistress cooperate with A? Once they get to the point where the mistress has the kid and the kid holds the patent, they could’ve just stopped. B owns the company, the kid owns the patent, and once B and the mistress run off on their own, A will be left with nothing.”
“It’s a lot of complicated bullshit for a very simple purpose—trying to pass his wealth down to his biological descendant. He just wants to manage his wealth himself before his son grows up. Can’t believe he has to go through all of that just to manage the fruits of his own labour.”
“This is still from the blogger I follow that performs paternity tests.
I was listening to him share a bunch of cases where the tests were negative, and one of them was really the most despairing situation I’ve ever heard of.
There was this couple with a pair of twins who were 5-years-old. The twins were test tube babies they made through an institution, using the couple’s sperm and eggs, carried to term by the mom.
But these twins don’t look like their mom or dad at all. The more the two raised those kids, the more they suspected they weren’t actually theirs. But the couple also both trusted each other, and kept thinking the hospital mixed the babies up or something, so they came to get a test.
The results of the test was unbelievable.
Both the kids were biologically related to their dad, but not their mom.
The only possibility is that when they were making the test tube babies, the institution used the wrong eggs, on purpose or by accident. This pair of twins is actually the result of the dad’s sperm with some other woman’s eggs, and the mom here was just a surrogate.
I put myself in this mom’s shoes and I honestly would feel like my world ended. I would rather the kids were related to neither of us than that they were only related to one of us.
Kids you’ve raised for 5 years weren’t actually yours, but they are your husband’s, they just have a different mom. She’s in a super awkward position. There’s no way she’s happy continuing to raise them. But if she doesn’t want to keep raising them, her only option is divorce. And then she’ll have to face the tragedy of losing both her marriage and her kids.
She did nothing wrong. She went through the hell of IVF just to get kids, and went through the pain of being pregnant with twins. And more importantly, she might have biological kids out there somewhere with god knows who. Oh my god, I would literally go crazy.
I’ve never thought there could be such a difficult problem in life. Even if this happened to my worst enemy, I would feel a little sympathetic.”
Comments say, “I come across that blogger all the time and I’ve heard a lot of cases.”
“Love is stronger than blood. If you take care of them well, they’ll be no different from your biological kids.”
“Eggs are really precious. Is it that easy to mix them up?”
“I suspect the guy was involved somehow.”
A thread of people discussing the case of the DIL raped by her FIL, where the husband insists that his dad was drunk and didn’t know what was happening and therefore was innocent:
“Both the son and dad should be in prison.”
“I’ve told you before that if you were actually drunk, you can’t get hard. If you can have sex, that means you were conscious.”
“Married while underaged, already have two kids…”
“If he was drunk, he would’ve fucked his son.”
“Oh my god, he still has two daughters at home.”
“Her husband has inherited her FIL’s genes perfectly.”
“She needs to take those two girls back to her home immediately or I can’t even imagine the consequences.”
“If alcohol can become an excuse for crime, then alcohol should be an illegal drug.”
“If he was drunk, why didn’t he fuck his son? I suspect these two are both father and son and brothers.”
“Saudi Arabia, the strict father to Indians.
It turns out, Saudi Arabians are the strict fathers of Indians.
Indians have been making trouble all over the world, and yet Saudi Arabia has 2.6 million Indians and they’re all extremely well-behaved.
It’s simple. Saudi Arabia designed a Kafala system for Indians and completely controlled them.
Kafala is only the first step. Every India that enters the country has to find a guarantor first. The guarantor holds onto your passport. If you want to change jobs, you need to get your guarantor’s permission. If you want to go back home, you need your guarantor’s permission. Your wages get paid to your guarantor first. Basically, once you arrive in Saudi Arabia, you’re the personal property of your guarantor.
The second step is physical isolation.
Saudi law requires that Indian workers can’t rent in normal developments. They have to live in worker camps designated by the government. You don’t even have the right to approach the communities, high-end housing, and commercial circles of the locals.
There’s a section of the outskirts of Riyadh that’s the biggest worker camp in Saudi, with over 500,000 people squished inside, and more than half of them are Indians. It’s all temporary shacks which house a dozen people each. The smell of sweat and rotting food and humidity mixes up to knock you out if you set a single foot inside.
Management is absolute too. At 6AM, the supervisor yells on the loudspeakers and you have to be finished washing up in half an hour. Then you all get on a closed bus to the construction zone. When you’re done working at night, the bus takes you back to camp.
You like to group together? You like to turn everywhere you go into Little India? I’ll just isolate you. How are you going to infiltrate society now?
The third step: cut off the root. Saudi doesn’t believe in birthright citizenship. Your kid is born in Saudi Arabia? It doesn’t mean anything. They don’t get citizenship. They don’t get a single cent of public school, free health care, or oil benefits.
Your visa expired? You and your kid can all leave. There’s no room for negotiation. You want to stay by marrying? No way. Five or six departments need to sign off on a local Saudi woman marrying a foreign man. The barrier of entry is ridiculous. Even if you jump through all the hoops and get married, you still don’t get citizenship. You and your kid still has to fuck off back to India sooner or later.
The Saudi’s logic is very simple: they want the cheap labour, they want you to do all the jobs nobody else wants to do, but you want to stay? No way. If you make a fuss, we’ll just bury you.
From 2015 to 2019, 12595 Indians died in Saudi, an average of 2500 per year. From 2020 to 2023, it’s another five figures of people.
How did they die? Saudi claims it’s “natural causes” and “heart attack”.
If this happened in every other country, the Indian media would have exploded. But it’s Saudi, so they just have to put up with it.
Why is this method so effective? Because Indians have never been controlled like this in other countries.
In Canada, the government doesn’t dare to do anything about Indians pooping everywhere. In England and America, the politicians can’t do anything about Indians bathing in rivers. In Australia, the government pretends not to notice anything as Indians take all the local jobs.
Why? Because these countries are scared of Indians. Scared of them grouping together, scared of them making trouble, scared of Indians saying they’re not tolerant enough.
But Saudis aren’t scared. Saudis are rich and they don’t care.
The rules are listed right here. If you can accept it, then you can stay and work. If you can’t, then you can fuck off. They have no mercy at all. In the last 20 years, Saudi Arabia has done multiple rounds of clean ups and deported 500,000 Indians, and the Indians were all mild-mannered and didn’t make so much as a peep. Though Saudi Arabia has abused me a thousand times, I will continue to love Saudi Arabia like it’s my first.
That’s the attitude the Saudis have towards Indians and they’ve thoroughly tamed Indians. So when are we going to see such a great method propagated around the globe?”
Comments say, “Why would we copy the Saudis? Do we lack labour or something? Why do we have to let these things in and then waste a bunch of effort on managing them?”
“It doesn’t work in China. Those boomers are hoping the Indians are going to pull spending up.”
“Can Saudis manage the Brahmins?”